ArticleMicromachines2026
Plasma-Side Analysis of Chemical-to-Ion Flux Balance and Ion Energy-Angular Distributions in Ar/O
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-damage plasma processing of atomically thin MoS2 requires simultaneous control of ion species, energy, and incident angle, yet the discharge mechanisms governing Ar/O2 plasma and their connection to surface damage remain insufficiently understood. Here, we investigate the effect of the Ar/O2 mixing ratio on the spatial distributions of charged particles, the plasma potential, and the substrate-incident ion energy and angular distributions in a low-voltage, single-frequency capacitively coupled plasma using a two-dimensional particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision (PIC-MCC) simulation. At a fixed pressure of 50 mTorr with the Ar/O2 ratio varied from 9:1 to 2:8, the ion energy and angular distributions were collected at the center and edge of the powered electrode. Increasing the oxygen fraction reduced the electron density while enhancing the O- density and electronegativity, driving an electropositive-to-electronegative transition near 8:2, and shifted the dominant positive ion from Ar+ to O2+, with O+ remaining minor owing to charge-exchange loss. The plasma potential and ion-energy peaks generally increased with the oxygen fraction but showed nonmonotonic dependence, while radial edge fields tilted and broadened the angular distributions. To link the ion and oxygen-radical fluxes to MoS2 processing without assuming uncertain surface-response coefficients, we interpreted the ion and oxygen-radical fluxes through a phenomenological two-channel surface-reaction scheme, introducing a damaging ion fraction and a radical-to-ion flux ratio. Their opposing trends reveal an intrinsic trade-off, indicating that an intermediate O2 fraction offers a more favorable low-damage window than either Ar-rich or strongly oxygen-rich conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.