Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42653389›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Distant Kinship Inference and Forensic Genetic Genealogy.

Denisse Stephania Becerra-Loaiza, Nayeli González-Ortiz, Yolanda Puga-Carrillo, Joel Alberto Aguilar-Velázquez, Itzae Adonai Gutiérrez-Hurtado, José Alonso Aguilar-Velázquez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Denisse Stephania Becerra-LoaizaEstancia Posdoctoral Avalada por la Secretaría de Ciencias, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI), Guadalajara 44540, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1251-3383
Nayeli González-OrtizInstituto de Genética Humana "Dr. Enrique Corona Rivera", Departamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0003-7642-2699
Yolanda Puga-CarrilloInstituto de Genética Humana "Dr. Enrique Corona Rivera", Departamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0008-4725-0708
Joel Alberto Aguilar-VelázquezDepartamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa, Mexico City 09340, Mexico.
Itzae Adonai Gutiérrez-HurtadoDepartamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6174-0609
José Alonso Aguilar-VelázquezDepartamento de Morfología, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5346-5595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic genetics is moving from locus-based DNA profiling toward genome-wide inference enabled by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. While short tandem repeats remain central to routine human identification, SNP-based technologies and massively parallel sequencing have expanded the analysis of distant kinship through detection of identity-by-descent (IBD) segments and shared autosomal DNA. This narrative review synthesizes the biological basis of SNP-based distant kinship inference, the statistical and computational frameworks used to model genomic relatedness, and the operational transition from relatedness detection to forensic genetic genealogy (FGG). It distinguishes genetic genealogy database matching from formal forensic kinship testing, targeted SNP panels, SNP capture, low-coverage sequencing, Bayesian and machine-learning approaches, and independent forensic confirmation. Applications in criminal investigations, unidentified human remains, historical identifications, and broader relationship-inference contexts are discussed. The review also examines limitations related to recombination, stochastic inheritance, marker density, genotype quality, degraded or mixed forensic samples, population structure, endogamy, database composition, and genealogical record availability. Ethical and regulatory issues involving consent, privacy, database governance, law-enforcement access, data retention, and non-consenting relatives are considered. Overall, SNP-based forensic genomics can generate powerful investigative leads, but its outputs must be interpreted within method-specific analytical and evidentiary boundaries.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideHumansdistant kinshipforensic genetic genealogygenetic genealogy database matchingidentity by descentinvestigative genetic genealogymassively parallel sequencingsingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID42653389
PMCPMC13513495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.