ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Distant Kinship Inference and Forensic Genetic Genealogy.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic genetics is moving from locus-based DNA profiling toward genome-wide inference enabled by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. While short tandem repeats remain central to routine human identification, SNP-based technologies and massively parallel sequencing have expanded the analysis of distant kinship through detection of identity-by-descent (IBD) segments and shared autosomal DNA. This narrative review synthesizes the biological basis of SNP-based distant kinship inference, the statistical and computational frameworks used to model genomic relatedness, and the operational transition from relatedness detection to forensic genetic genealogy (FGG). It distinguishes genetic genealogy database matching from formal forensic kinship testing, targeted SNP panels, SNP capture, low-coverage sequencing, Bayesian and machine-learning approaches, and independent forensic confirmation. Applications in criminal investigations, unidentified human remains, historical identifications, and broader relationship-inference contexts are discussed. The review also examines limitations related to recombination, stochastic inheritance, marker density, genotype quality, degraded or mixed forensic samples, population structure, endogamy, database composition, and genealogical record availability. Ethical and regulatory issues involving consent, privacy, database governance, law-enforcement access, data retention, and non-consenting relatives are considered. Overall, SNP-based forensic genomics can generate powerful investigative leads, but its outputs must be interpreted within method-specific analytical and evidentiary boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.