Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42653363›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Preclinical Evaluation of Combined Polo-like Kinase 1 Inhibition and Navitoclax in Experimental Models of Lung Cancer.

Bárbara Pinto, Mateus Prates-Rodrigues, Daniel Augusto Barnabe Nobre, Mariana de Oliveira Silva, Bárbara M de Amorim-Santos, João P N Silva, Patrícia M A Silva, Bruno Sarmento, Marisa Salvi, Geovanni Dantas Cassali and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bárbara PintoUNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário (CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.
Mateus Prates-RodriguesDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-0508-5298
Daniel Augusto Barnabe NobreDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9590-8059
Mariana de Oliveira SilvaDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1376-5964
Bárbara M de Amorim-SantosDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1118-1049
João P N SilvaUNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário (CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-4286
Patrícia M A SilvaUNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário (CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0694-7321
Bruno Sarmentoi3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Marisa SalviDepartment of General Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-3393
Geovanni Dantas CassaliDepartment of General Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5650-6743
Elaine Maria de Souza-FagundesDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Hassan BousbaaUNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário (CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4006-5779
Juliana Carvalho-TavaresDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.

Funding

CESPU-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário Crl BD/CBAS/CESPU/01/2020CESPU-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário Crl BD/CBAS/CESPU/01/2021CESPU-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário Crl FlavCanAct-GI2-CESPU-2025CESPU-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário Crl TargetMito-GI2-CESPU-2025Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-02137-22Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) 2022.09451.BDMinas Gerais Network for Translational Research in Immunobiologicals and Biopharmaceuticals in Cancer REMITRIBIC, RED-00031-21National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) 303368/2021-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted therapies have substantially advanced cancer treatment; however, therapeutic resistance remains a major challenge, particularly in lung cancer. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK-1), a key regulator of mitosis, is frequently overexpressed in lung tumors and has emerged as an attractive anticancer target. Although PLK-1 inhibition induces robust antitumor effects in preclinical models, its translation into clinical benefit has been limited, particularly when used as monotherapy. Previous in vitro work from our group demonstrated that combining PLK-1 inhibition with the pro-apoptotic agent Navitoclax markedly enhanced cancer cell death by reducing mitotic slippage and promoting post-mitotic apoptosis. Here, we investigated whether this combinatorial strategy translates into therapeutic benefit in vivo. Using Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1) cells, we evaluated the effects of BI2536 (a PLK-1 inhibitor) and Navitoclax, alone or in combination, in vitro and in male C57BL/6J mice using three lung cancer models: subcutaneous, intranasal, and intrapulmonary. The in vitro results corroborated the findings of our previous work, demonstrating synergistic effects. In the murine models, tumor progression, body weight, survival, and histopathological features were assessed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and systemic toxicity. In the subcutaneous model, BI2536 monotherapy significantly reduced tumor volume compared with vehicle-treated controls, while Navitoclax alone and the combination therapy also produced tumor growth inhibition. In contrast, in the intranasal model, no significant differences were observed in body weight or survival among groups. Nonetheless, treatment with BI2536 alone or in combination with Navitoclax significantly reduced tumor cell proliferative activity. In the aggressive intrapulmonary (orthotopic) model, rapid disease progression and high mortality were observed across all groups. Notably, BI2536 treatment was associated with improved survival compared with Navitoclax monotherapy, whereas the combination therapy did not confer additional survival benefit. Histological analyses revealed highly proliferative tumors with pronounced cellular and nuclear atypia. Moreover, the BI2536 monotherapy group exhibited significantly greater necrosis/apoptosis than the other treatment groups, while diffuse and focal hepatic steatosis was observed exclusively in the combination group. Together, these findings indicate that while PLK-1 inhibition exerts antitumor effects in certain in vivo contexts, the therapeutic synergy observed in vitro with Navitoclax does not consistently translate to in vivo lung cancer models. This study highlights the challenges of translating combinatorial mitotic and apoptotic targeting strategies into effective in vivo therapies and underscores the importance of model selection and tumor microenvironment in preclinical drug evaluation.

Indexed as

Aniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Lewis LungCell Cycle ProteinsLung NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPteridinesSulfonamidesAnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalDrug SynergismAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsBI 2536Cell Cycle ProteinsnavitoclaxPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPteridinesSulfonamidesBI2536combination therapylung cancer animal modelsNavitoclaxPLK-1

Identifiers

PMID42653363
PMCPMC13512934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.