Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42653345›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology for Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer.

Yesul Jeong, Sungman Hong, Sangjeong Ahn, Sung Hak Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yesul JeongDepartment of Hospital Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2952-1662
Sungman HongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Sangjeong AhnDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hak LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-5838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is one of the most rapidly increasing gynaecological malignancies worldwide. The clinically adapted molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma, derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas, comprises four major subtypes: POLE-mutated, mismatch repair-deficient, p53-abnormal expression, and no specific molecular profile. Its clinical implementation has improved prognostic stratification, risk assessment, and treatment decision-making in patients with endometrial carcinoma. However, current workflows rely on immunohistochemistry and targeted sequencing, which increase costs, turnaround times, and infrastructure requirements, thereby limiting their universal adoption in routine clinical practice. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning models capable of predicting molecular features directly from H&E-stained whole-slide images, have emerged as promising tools for precision oncology. In addition to reproducing established molecular classification, these approaches may reveal previously unrecognised biomarker-defined histologic patterns that are difficult to detect using conventional methods. This article synthesises the current evidence on AI-based molecular classification in endometrial carcinoma from a pathologist-centred perspective, emphasising the biological rationale, methodological limitations, and future directions for clinical translation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndometrial NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMutationBiomarkers, Tumorartificial intelligencedeep learningdigital pathologyendometrial cancermicrosatellite instabilitymismatch repair deficiencymolecular classificationPOLE mutationtumour mutational burdenwhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID42653345
PMCPMC13512974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.