ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology for Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is one of the most rapidly increasing gynaecological malignancies worldwide. The clinically adapted molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma, derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas, comprises four major subtypes: POLE-mutated, mismatch repair-deficient, p53-abnormal expression, and no specific molecular profile. Its clinical implementation has improved prognostic stratification, risk assessment, and treatment decision-making in patients with endometrial carcinoma. However, current workflows rely on immunohistochemistry and targeted sequencing, which increase costs, turnaround times, and infrastructure requirements, thereby limiting their universal adoption in routine clinical practice. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning models capable of predicting molecular features directly from H&E-stained whole-slide images, have emerged as promising tools for precision oncology. In addition to reproducing established molecular classification, these approaches may reveal previously unrecognised biomarker-defined histologic patterns that are difficult to detect using conventional methods. This article synthesises the current evidence on AI-based molecular classification in endometrial carcinoma from a pathologist-centred perspective, emphasising the biological rationale, methodological limitations, and future directions for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.