Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42653305›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

IAGRN: An Interleaved-Attention Graph Neural Network for Gene Regulatory Network Inference.

Yue Wang, Sicheng Tian, Dan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue WangSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Sicheng TianSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Dan LiSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62372098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) describe regulatory interactions between transcription factors and their target genes and are essential for understanding cellular processes and disease mechanisms. Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have enabled data-driven GRN inference at single-cell resolution. However, the high sparsity and noise inherent in scRNA-seq data pose substantial challenges for accurately recovering regulatory relationships. Existing graph neural network (GNN)-based approaches often rely on localized message passing, which can lead to over-smoothing and limited modeling of long-range regulatory dependencies. To address these limitations, a structure-aware interleaved-attention graph learning framework, termed IAGRN, is proposed for GRN inference from scRNA-seq data. Specifically, it interleaves topology-constrained local attention with distance-aware global attention, enabling effective integration of structural priors and long-range regulatory signals. Graph Laplacian positional encoding is further incorporated to preserve topological information and enhance node representations. Evaluations on seven public benchmark datasets demonstrate that IAGRN consistently improves GRN reconstruction under highly sparse conditions and achieves competitive performance compared with existing approaches.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsGraph Neural NetworksHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysisattention mechanismsdeep learning frameworksgene regulatory networksgraph neural networkssingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42653305
PMCPMC13513789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.