ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Condition-Specific LC Retention Time Prediction: Feature-Selected QSRR Versus Pretrained Graph Isomorphism Network Transfer Learning.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Condition-specific liquid chromatographic retention time prediction remains challenging because retention depends on both molecular structure and experimental conditions. This study compared feature-selected quantitative structure-retention relationship (FS-QSRR) models with pretrained graph isomorphism network (GIN) transfer learning for three reversed-phase LC datasets measured under acidic, neutral, and basic conditions. Mordred descriptor-based QSRR models were developed using leakage-safe preprocessing, nested cross-validation, and feature selection. The selected FS-QSRR workflow for each dataset was then compared with pretrained GIN transfer learning using identical 100 repeated random 80/20 train-test splits. Feature selection substantially reduced descriptor dimensionality but did not consistently improve predictive accuracy over the best baseline descriptor models. Under matched validation, GIN transfer learning gave lower RMSE for all three datasets, decreasing error from 0.816 to 0.613 min under acidic conditions, from 0.868 to 0.665 min under neutral conditions, and from 1.019 to 0.876 min under basic conditions. The corresponding RMSE reductions were 24.8%, 23.4%, and 14.0%, respectively. Matched prediction error analysis showed that GIN particularly reduced the frequency and magnitude of large errors, although the improvement was more modest under basic conditions. Descriptor frequency analysis revealed condition-dependent contributions from lipophilicity, ionization-related, electronic, and topological descriptor groups. These findings support pretrained GIN transfer learning as the stronger predictive approach, while FS-QSRR remains valuable for model simplification and chemical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.