ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Saudi Patient-Derived Brain and Intracranial Explanted Tumor Cells: Isolation, Growth, and Anticancer Drug Screening.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain cancer is a highly aggressive disease with limited treatment options, highlighting the need for reliable preclinical models for drug discovery. This study aimed to isolate and characterize Saudi patient-derived primary brain cancer cells and assess the anticancer activity of novel compounds developed in-house. Sixteen tumor samples from Saudi patients were processed to establish primary brain cancer cultures and One Normal Tissue (Control). The cells were successfully isolated and maintained under optimized conditions, with their morphology and growth characteristics monitored. Molecular analysis confirmed the expression of key tumor and neural markers. The anticancer activity of selected compounds, KCO69, KCO70, and KCO129, was tested at various concentrations using the MTT and CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. All compounds caused a concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability, with the strongest effects seen at 25 µM. Among them, compound 70 showed the most significant antiproliferative activity, while compounds KCO69 and KCO129 exhibited moderate effects. Variability in treatment response among cultures reflected the inherent heterogeneity of patient-derived tumors. Overall, establishing primary brain cancer cell models from Saudi patients offers a valuable platform for preclinical drug screening and supports further research on these compounds as potential therapies for brain cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.