ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Phage Therapy Enhanced by Using Engineered Bacteriophages: A Powerful Antibacterial Tool to Address the Dilemma Posed by Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuous slowdown in the research and development of new antibiotics and antibiotic overuse have turned the problem of antibacterial resistance into a global public health crisis. As a very promising alternative to multi-drug-resistant bacterial infection, phage therapy is receiving renewed attention. However, the inherent biological limitations of natural phages restrict their extensive clinical application. This review examines how synthetic biology can be harnessed to transform phages and to build the next generation of antibacterial therapies. We outline the main advantages of natural phages, including high host specificity, self-amplification, bactericidal activity and the ability to degrade biofilms. We also point out the bottlenecks of clinical applications of bacteriophages, such as narrow host range, rapid removal in the body and potential genetic safety risks. Moreover, we elaborate on the core synthetic biological tools used to overcome the above limitations, including CRISPR-Cas gene editing, receptor-binding protein reprogramming, functional load delivery and immunogenic regulation, and summarize the recent clinical progress and personalized treatment process. The increasing clinical evidence shows that synthetic biology can effectively overcome the inherent defects of natural bacteriophages, confirming the safety and initial efficacy of bacteriophage therapy. Engineered phages provide a practical strategy to meet the antimicrobial resistance challenge. Clinical applications of such phages will mainly depend on progress in production standardization, regulatory framework construction and scientific and reasonable joint treatment program development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.