Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42653094›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

ERβ-Score: An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Scoring Function and Web Server for Estrogen Receptor β-Guided Drug Discovery in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Abbas Khan, Muhammad Ammar Zahid, Walid Kouidri, Osama Aboubakr Mohamed, Ahmed Mohammad Gharaibeh, Ladun Ibrahim Mohamed, Amani Anwar Al-Mansori, Mohamed Haitham Elsayed, Anwar Mohammad, Ameera Al-Jabiry and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abbas KhanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0008-9754-9097
Muhammad Ammar ZahidDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-7222-6776
Walid KouidriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0006-1304-5939
Osama Aboubakr MohamedDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0002-2769-3508
Ahmed Mohammad GharaibehDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0007-1323-2053
Ladun Ibrahim MohamedDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Amani Anwar Al-MansoriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0004-1618-7794
Mohamed Haitham ElsayedDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-6373-2629
Anwar MohammadPrecision Health Analysis Unit, Translational Research, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Dasman 15462, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0001-6318-8707
Ameera Al-JabiryDepartment of Chemistry and Earth Sciences, College of Arts and Science, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0007-2408-552X
Mohanad ShkoorDepartment of Chemistry and Earth Sciences, College of Arts and Science, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-6748-3663
Raed M Al-ZoubiSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha P.O. Box 3050, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-429X
Abdelali AgouniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-1582

Funding

QRDI UREP31-188-3-051 and ARG01-0601-230451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most clinically aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by the absence of targetable hormone receptors and HER2 amplification, significantly constraining treatment choices. Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERβ) has emerged as a biologically relevant yet underutilized target in TNBC, with its re-expression linked to tumor suppression and improved prognosis, prompting the development of selective ERβ modulators as a precision therapeutic approach. We introduce ERβ-Score, an interpretable machine learning scoring system developed using a curated dataset of 1699 ERβ bioactive chemicals obtained from ChEMBL, characterized by 39 physicochemical and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. After implementing scaffold-disjoint train/test partitioning to avert structural data leakage, a Gradient Boosting Classifier, fine-tuned through Bayesian hyperparameter optimization, attained in five-fold cross-validation a Precision-Recall AUC (Area Under the Curve) of 0.891, a ROC-AUC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) of 0.888, a Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.664, an F1-score of 0.838, and a balanced accuracy of 0.831; on the scaffold-disjoint hold-out test set it attained a Precision-Recall AUC of 0.905, a ROC-AUC of 0.864, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.578, indicating strong and balanced discrimination between active and inactive ERβ modulators. We note explicitly that this scaffold-disjoint hold-out constitutes internal validation, since it derives from the same curated ChEMBL workflow used for model development, and it is therefore reported throughout as scaffold-disjoint internal validation rather than as independent external validation. The applicability domain boundaries were established using a k-nearest-neighbor Tanimoto-similarity method with ECFP4 (Extended-Connectivity Fingerprint with a Diameter of 4) fingerprints, offering a quantitative confidence metric that identifies structurally new molecules beyond the model's reliable prediction range. External validation against independent Tox21 ERβ bioassay data confirmed genuine, statistically significant predictive signal (ROC-AUC = 0.71) while revealing reduced sensitivity for structurally novel active compounds. The model was subsequently used for extensive virtual screening of natural product and drug-like compound libraries, with prioritized candidates undergoing structure-based molecular docking against the ERβ co-crystal structure (PDB: 7XWQ) using Smina, facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of hits based on both ligand and structural properties. To enhance accessibility, the complete pipeline was implemented as an open-access interactive web application utilizing Streamlit, enabling researchers to input any SMILES string and obtain, in real time, an activity prediction with a probability score, applicability domain classification, Lipinski drug-likeness assessment, interactive three-dimensional visualization of protein-ligand interactions, and on-demand docking within the ERβ active site.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DiscoveryEstrogen Receptor betaMachine LearningTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBayes TheoremFemaleHumansInternetAntineoplastic AgentsEstrogen Receptor betabreast cancerERβmachine learningvirtual screeningweb applicationY-randomization

Identifiers

PMID42653094
PMCPMC13513820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.