ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical Application of Transcutaneous Microcurrent Therapy for an Acute Traumatic Contusion in a Special Operations Military Officer: A Case Report.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contusions are highly prevalent injuries in the armed forces. They can substantially impair physical performance, particularly in special operations forces, where operational readiness depends on maintaining a high level of physical fitness. Transcutaneous microcurrent therapy (TMCT) is a non-invasive intervention that has been reported to promote tissue repair. The aim of this case report was to describe the evolution of creatine kinase levels, functional outcomes, pain, and perceived well-being during TMCT following an acute traumatic contusion. Case presentation: A 34-year-old special operations military officer with an acute traumatic contusion in the dorsum of the left foot received TMCT applied over the injured area for 72 h. The device delivered a monophasic rectangular current at 21 mV and 42 μA, with a total application time of 2360 min over the 72-h observation period. CK and the Hooper Index were assessed at baseline and at 24, 48, and 72 h, whereas NPRS and LLFI were assessed at baseline and at 72 h. Over the 72-h observation period, CK decreased from 571 to 203 IU/L, the Hooper Index decreased from 15 to 12 points, the NPRS score decreased from 7 to 6 points, and the LLFI score increased from 52% to 84%. No intervention-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions: During the 72-h observation period, reductions in CK and pain and an increase in perceived lower-limb function were observed while the participant was receiving TMCT. These preliminary observations support further investigation of TMCT as a potential adjunct to standard conservative care. However, the single-case design and the absence of a control condition prevent the observed changes from being attributed to TMCT. Controlled studies are required to evaluate its efficacy and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.