ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Rate-Associated Differences in Within-Session Motor-Inhibitory Performance: Exploratory Role of Affective Temperament.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Response inhibition is often summarized as a single individual score, although performance may change within a session as temporal demand and repeated exposure vary. We examined whether change in No-Go motor performance differed across stimulus-rate conditions and was associated with affective temperament in 53 physically active participants, predominantly young adults. Participants completed three blocks of an elbow-based Go/No-Go task; four 50-stimulus series were administered at 40, 50, 60, and 70 bpm in randomized order. The analysis included 636 series-level observations and 6360 No-Go trials, including 3185 commission errors (50.1%). Commission-error occurrence was given primary interpretive priority; conditional error duration was considered complementary, and the pragmatically weighted integrated error index was treated as a secondary composite. Error burden differed across stimulus-rate conditions, and rate-by-block interactions emerged for commission-error occurrence (trial-level GEE; Wald χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.