ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Psychedelic Safety and Clinical Outcomes Across Exposure Patterns: A Structured Narrative Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials and naturalistic studies describe psychedelics under markedly different exposure conditions. This narrative review searched PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and regulatory sources through 15 July 2026, and examined safety and outcomes across four dimensions of exposure: dose, frequency, person, and context. In screened adults receiving one to three supervised doses, transient headache, nausea, anxiety, and cardiovascular activation are common; serious reactions are uncommon but include persistent anxiety, suicidality signals, and a recent case of hallucinogen persisting perception disorder. Evidence supports MDMA (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine) -assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder and psilocybin-based interventions for depression, although functional unblinding, selected samples, inconsistent comparators, and a recent negative primary trial constrain certainty. Naturalistic studies suggest that vulnerability and context modify outcomes, but frequency is inconsistently measured and rarely linked to cumulative exposure or long-term health. Short-term microdosing trials show limited benefit, whereas long-term cardiac and psychiatric safety remains unresolved. Exposure-defined cohorts, prospective registries, echocardiographic surveillance, and blinding-aware comparative trials are priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.