Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42653013›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Analysis by Machine Learning of Geriatric Frailty and Alzheimer's Disease Classification Using Independent Datasets.

Lăcrămioara Luminița Apescaritei Apostol, Claudia Simona Ștefan, Mihai Grecu, Simona Moldovanu, Gabriela Isabela Verga, Mihaela Lungu, Gabriel Ioan Prada, Aurelia Romila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lăcrămioara Luminița Apescaritei ApostolResearch Centre in the Medical-Pharmaceutical Field, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, 800010 Galați, Romania.
Claudia Simona ȘtefanResearch Centre in the Medical-Pharmaceutical Field, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, 800010 Galați, Romania.
Mihai GrecuResearch Centre in the Medical-Pharmaceutical Field, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, 800010 Galați, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-7703-7506
Simona MoldovanuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, 800146 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5934-329X
Gabriela Isabela VergaResearch Centre in the Medical-Pharmaceutical Field, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, 800010 Galați, Romania.ORCID 0009-0009-5438-666X
Mihaela LunguResearch Centre in the Medical-Pharmaceutical Field, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, 800010 Galați, Romania.
Gabriel Ioan PradaClinic Department, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050711 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4762-9581
Aurelia RomilaResearch Centre in the Medical-Pharmaceutical Field, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, 800010 Galați, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty syndrome and Alzheimer's disease are prevalent conditions in the elderly that are associated with aging, decreased quality of life, and a significant healthcare burden. Evidence for a relationship between physical frailty and neurodegenerative decline is accumulating. This study analyzed two independent datasets, a frailty dataset based on gait and mobility parameters and an AD dataset with clinical, functional and lifestyle variables, in order to evaluate and compare their classification performance using machine learning. Features were optimized using dimensionality reduction techniques to keep predictors of clinical significance and hyperparameter optimized Random Forest models were built to develop the best model. Evaluation was performed with Accuracy, F1-score, Matthews Correlation Coefficient and Area Under the Curve. The results showed that the models constructed on the whole AD dataset achieved maximum predictive power with an accuracy of 0.946, which was slightly increased to an accuracy of 0.948 after the selection of significant features. Diagnostic models based on frailty were able to demonstrate an ACC predictive capacity of 0.6418, and in terms of feature selection, improvements appeared in all indicators. Regarding the features derived from Alzheimer's disease associated with geriatric frailty, they managed to surpass the ACC frailty features of 0.741 alone, suggesting some intercalation mechanisms between neurodegeneration and physical vulnerability. These findings show that machine learning algorithms accompanied by feature selection improve clinical discrimination and prediction of frailty and neurodegenerative disorders, which offers a promising aspect for geriatric assessment. The frailty models analyzed demonstrated an ACC predictive capacity of 0.6418, even though feature selection improved all indicators. Alzheimer's disease-derived features associated with frailty outperformed features in the frailty dataset with an ACC of 0.741, suggesting the mechanism of overlap between neurodegeneration and physical vulnerability. These results support the theory of a motor-cognitive aging continuum, indicating that algorithmic machine learning techniques coupled with feature selection mainly provide computational validation for the biological intersection of neurodegeneration and physical frailty, rather than forming an independent predictive clinical model. Using these algorithms the study highlights shared pathophysiological mechanisms, providing a significant insight into systemic geriatric deterioration.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s dementiaartificial intelligencegeriatric frailtyneurodegenerative disordersRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID42653013
PMCPMC13514911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.