Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42652968›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Potentially Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions in Oncology Patients Receiving Chronic Opioid Therapy: Prevalence and Associated Factors.

Gorana Nedin Ranković, Dane Krtinić, Aleksandar Nikolić, Ana Cvetanović, Mirjana Todorović Mitić, Milica Mihajlović, Irena Conić, Nikola Milenković, Nemanja Dimić, Nada Pejčić and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gorana Nedin RankovićDepartment of Pharmacology with Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Dane KrtinićDepartment of Pharmacology with Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Aleksandar NikolićDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesiology with Reanimatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Ana CvetanovićClinic of Oncology, University Clinical Center Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Mirjana Todorović MitićClinic of Oncology, University Clinical Center Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Milica MihajlovićClinic of Oncology, University Clinical Center Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Irena ConićClinic of Oncology, University Clinical Center Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Nikola MilenkovićDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2489-5123
Nemanja DimićClinic for Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care, University Clinical Hospital Centre "Dr Dragiša Mišović-Dedinje", 11040 Belgrade, Serbia.
Nada PejčićClinic for Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Clinical Center Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.ORCID 0009-0001-1369-6276
Iva BinićDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with malignant diseases receiving chronic opioid therapy are particularly susceptible to drug-drug interactions because of extensive polypharmacy, multimodal anticancer treatment, supportive care, and comorbidities. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of potentially clinically relevant drug-drug interactions and to identify factors associated with their occurrence.

methodsThis exploratory observational cross-sectional pilot study included 49 adult oncology patients receiving chronic opioid therapy. Complete medication regimens were screened using the Medscape Drug Interaction Checker and Lexicomp. Lexicomp category D and X interactions were analysed descriptively. Because category D interactions were nearly universal and category X interactions were rare, the presence of at least one Medscape "Serious-Use Alternative" interaction was used pragmatically as the binary outcome for regression modelling. Potential predictors were assessed using univariable binary logistic regression and a parsimonious adjusted model with covariates selected using a clinically informed approach. Because of quasi-complete separation, Firth's penalized-likelihood logistic regression was used as the primary adjusted analysis.

resultsLexicomp category D interactions were identified in 48 of 49 patients (98.0%), whereas category X interactions were present in 2 patients (4.1%). Medscape serious interactions were detected in 33 patients (67.3%). In the Firth-adjusted model, female sex was associated with lower odds of a Medscape serious interaction (adjusted OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.52), while cardiovascular disease was associated with higher odds (adjusted OR 5.16, 95% CI 1.27-26.31). Stage IV disease showed a positive but statistically non-significant association, and total medication count was not independently associated with the outcome in sensitivity analysis. Because of the small pilot sample and the resulting wide confidence intervals, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

conclusionsOncology patients receiving chronic opioid therapy had a high burden of potentially clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, predominantly Lexicomp category D interactions, warranting consideration of therapy modification and individualized monitoring rather than absolute avoidance. Regular medication review, use of complementary interaction databases, and individualized clinical assessment may improve pharmacotherapy safety in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacologydrug–drug interactionsLexicompMedscapeoncologyopioid therapypolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID42652968
PMCPMC13514474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.