Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42652963›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Interventions for Visual Field Loss After Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Naiara Díaz-Marín, Carmen López-de-la-Fuente, Yolanda Marcén, Jorge Pérez-Rey, Carmen Bilbao, María José López-de-la-Fuente

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naiara Díaz-MarínDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Carmen López-de-la-FuenteDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7471-5362
Yolanda MarcéniHealthy Research Group, Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5851-8855
Jorge Pérez-ReyDepartment of Human Anatomy and Histology, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-6010
Carmen BilbaoDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0009-0005-4146-2687
María José López-de-la-FuenteiHealthy Research Group, Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-6053

Funding

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón INTRAMURAL23/AAIAC/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquired brain injury (ABI) frequently results in visual field loss, a disabling condition that negatively affects visual exploration, reading, mobility, activities of daily living, and quality of life. This systematic review aimed to synthesise current evidence on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for visual field loss following ABI. The review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420261359820). Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest) were searched for studies published between January 2015 and May 2026. Twenty-eight studies met the eligibility criteria, including randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and case series. Interventions were classified as compensatory, substitutive, or restorative, the latter including neuromodulation techniques. Compensatory interventions provided the most consistent evidence of benefit, improving visual exploration, reading, mobility, activities of daily living, and vision-related quality of life. Restorative interventions produced more variable findings, with some studies reporting improvements in visual field sensitivity and stimulus detection, whereas evidence for substitutive approaches was limited because few eligible studies were identified. Overall, functional improvements were reported more consistently than objective visual field expansion. Current evidence supports visual rehabilitation as an important component of ABI management, although further high-quality research using standardised protocols and outcome measures is needed to establish the most effective interventions for different patient populations.

Indexed as

acquired brain injurycompensatory traininghomonymous hemianopianeuromodulationneuroplasticityrestorative therapystrokesubstitutive therapyvisual field lossvisual rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42652963
PMCPMC13514453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.