ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Resin Infiltration in the Conservative Management of Incipient Dental Caries: An Evidence-Based Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental caries is a biofilm-mediated, non-communicable, multifactorial disease in which the balance between demineralization and remineralization determines whether an initial enamel lesion remains stable, arrests, or progresses toward cavitation. Contemporary caries management prioritizes preservation of tooth structure and emphasizes individualized decisions based on lesion activity, cavitation status, cleansability, radiographic depth, and patient's caries risk. Resin infiltration has emerged as a microinvasive approach positioned between noninvasive preventive strategies and conventional restorative treatment. This evidence-based narrative review summarizes the current literature on resin infiltration for incipient, non-cavitated proximal carious lesions in permanent teeth, with emphasis on diagnosis, case selection, clinical protocol, and current evidence. A structured search of three databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) identified randomized clinical trials, observational clinical studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and relevant in vitro investigations. The strongest clinical evidence supports resin infiltration for non-cavitated proximal lesions in permanent teeth, particularly enamel and selected outer dentin lesions, where long-term studies demonstrate reduced radiographic progression. In vitro studies indicate that lesion penetration, enamel hardness, and surface roughness depend on lesion characteristics, pretreatment, and technique, and help explain the caries-arresting effect. Current evidence shows that resin infiltration should be considered a selective microinvasive option for incipient proximal caries, guided by lesion assessment and patient's caries risk rather than a universal substitute for prevention or restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.