Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42652831›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Prevention, Recognition, and Management of Anastomotic Leakage and Pelvic Sepsis After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Structured Narrative Review.

Koji Morohara, Tsunekazu Hanai, Kenji Oshima, Yui Kitagawa, Shiho Okada, Kosuke Mochizuki, Kazuma Horiguchi, Hiroki Tani, Yoshiki Kunimura, Takashi Imanaka and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Koji MoroharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-9634-2980
Tsunekazu HanaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Kenji OshimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Yui KitagawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Shiho OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Kosuke MochizukiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Kazuma HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroki TaniDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshiki KunimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Takashi ImanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-2332-6795
Takahiro TashiroDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Yuka KondoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-0193-2017
Hidetoshi NagataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroyuki KatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Zenichi MoriseDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-6502
Akihiko HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-1396
Hidetoshi KatsunoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7054-7808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage (AL) and pelvic sepsis remain important causes of morbidity after restorative rectal cancer surgery, affecting mortality, stoma-free survival, bowel function, and oncologic treatment. Reported rates after low anterior resection are approximately 5-20%. We conducted a structured narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library through 20 July 2026, focusing on prevention, recognition, source control, and long-term recovery after low pelvic reconstruction. Most biological requirements for healing and principles of source control are approach-agnostic, whereas open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries create different technical conditions for pelvic exposure, stapler trajectory, articulation, tactile feedback, conversion, and fluorescence imaging. This review therefore integrates approach-specific technical constraints with post-discharge recognition, anatomy-based source control, and patient-centered long-term outcomes rather than treating these domains separately. Among preventive measures, combined mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics has the strongest support in elective, non-obstructed patients; indocyanine green fluorescence is a useful adjunct when perfusion is uncertain but does not replace assessment of tension or mechanical integrity. C-reactive protein is mainly useful for ruling out major complications, whereas contrast-enhanced computed tomography remains first-line imaging and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging is best reserved for selected small defects, chronic sinuses, or complex pelvic sepsis. Management should be driven first by physiology and then by leak timing and location, defect size, conduit viability, diversion status, and cavity drainability. Durable success includes sepsis control, anatomical healing, stoma reversal when feasible, and acceptable long-term function.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakageendoluminal vacuum therapyindocyanine greenminimally invasive surgerypelvic sepsisrectal cancerrobot-assisted surgerystoma-free survival

Identifiers

PMID42652831
PMCPMC13514166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.