ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026
Surgery 4.0: From the Smart Operating Room to the Learning Operating Room.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The connected operating room captures, transmits, and displays data, but it does not learn. This perspective presents Chirurgie 4.0 (C40), a French-led initiative born within the Commission Innovation of the Académie nationale de chirurgie, which proposes not only a concept but a method for the safe adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery. At its core is the C40 Maturity Model of the Operating Room, a human-governed "surgical world model" describing the transition from the Smart OR to the Learning OR across six levels, from the conventional operating room to a sovereign, federated network of surgical world models. We situate surgical autonomy on an explicit six-level scale, show that autonomous devices are already an accepted clinical reality in fields such as interventional cardiology, ophthalmology, neuro- and orthopedic surgery, and argue that governance must be native rather than retrofitted, through a Cognitive Governance Layer resting on human oversight, explainability, auditability and agent governance. We describe the economic and sovereignty stakes specific to intelligent surgical technologies and set out the design of the 2026 C40 field survey, whose results will feed a Livre Blanc for public decision-makers. C40 offers five steps that can genuinely be climbed, and a method for climbing them safely, with the surgeon retaining final clinical authority at every step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.