Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42652766›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.

Róża Kosińska, Artur Fabijan, Robert Fabijan, Laura Kosińska, Emilia Nowosławska, Krzysztof Zakrzewski, Bartosz Polis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Róża KosińskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Polish-Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Artur FabijanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Polish-Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0998-4435
Robert FabijanIndependent Researcher, Luton LU2 0GS, UK.
Laura KosińskaInstitute of Turbomachinery, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.
Emilia NowosławskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Polish-Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Krzysztof ZakrzewskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Polish-Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Bartosz PolisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Polish-Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional spinal deformity that requires early detection, accurate radiological assessment, individualized treatment planning, and long-term monitoring. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool across multiple stages of scoliosis management, including screening, automated imaging analysis, deformity classification, prediction of progression, surgical planning, postoperative outcome assessment, and patient education. This narrative review summarizes current and emerging applications of AI in scoliosis, with particular emphasis on studies published after 2023. Deep learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks, U-Net-based architectures, transformer models, and generative approaches, have demonstrated high accuracy in automated Cobb angle measurement, vertebral segmentation, coronal and sagittal parameter assessment, and radiation-free screening using surface topography or smartphone-based photographs. Machine learning models have also shown potential in predicting curve progression, treatment response, risk of postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes by integrating radiological, clinical, biomechanical, and, increasingly, multimodal data. In parallel, large language models and generative AI tools are being investigated for patient education, communication support, readability improvement, and research hypothesis generation. Despite these advances, important limitations remain, including limited external validation, dataset heterogeneity, potential algorithmic bias, insufficient interpretability, and incomplete integration into clinical workflows. Moreover, while AI systems show strong performance in automated measurement and screening tasks, their role in complex therapeutic decision-making, such as Lenke classification, fusion-level selection, and autonomous surgical planning, remains experimental. Overall, AI has the potential to improve the precision, efficiency, and personalization of scoliosis care; however, prospective multicentre studies, transparent reporting, explainable model design, and regulatory validation are essential before widespread clinical implementation.

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosisartificial intelligenceCobb angledeep learninglarge language modelsmachine learningpredictive modelsscoliosisspinal deformitysurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID42652766
PMCPMC13513889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.