ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional spinal deformity that requires early detection, accurate radiological assessment, individualized treatment planning, and long-term monitoring. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool across multiple stages of scoliosis management, including screening, automated imaging analysis, deformity classification, prediction of progression, surgical planning, postoperative outcome assessment, and patient education. This narrative review summarizes current and emerging applications of AI in scoliosis, with particular emphasis on studies published after 2023. Deep learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks, U-Net-based architectures, transformer models, and generative approaches, have demonstrated high accuracy in automated Cobb angle measurement, vertebral segmentation, coronal and sagittal parameter assessment, and radiation-free screening using surface topography or smartphone-based photographs. Machine learning models have also shown potential in predicting curve progression, treatment response, risk of postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes by integrating radiological, clinical, biomechanical, and, increasingly, multimodal data. In parallel, large language models and generative AI tools are being investigated for patient education, communication support, readability improvement, and research hypothesis generation. Despite these advances, important limitations remain, including limited external validation, dataset heterogeneity, potential algorithmic bias, insufficient interpretability, and incomplete integration into clinical workflows. Moreover, while AI systems show strong performance in automated measurement and screening tasks, their role in complex therapeutic decision-making, such as Lenke classification, fusion-level selection, and autonomous surgical planning, remains experimental. Overall, AI has the potential to improve the precision, efficiency, and personalization of scoliosis care; however, prospective multicentre studies, transparent reporting, explainable model design, and regulatory validation are essential before widespread clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.