ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Theranostics in Radiation Medicine: Integrating Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and External-Beam Radiotherapy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theranostics has transformed nuclear medicine from an imaging-focused discipline into a data-rich radiation medicine platform in which target expression, pharmacokinetics, tumor dose, and response can be measured in the same patient. This critical narrative review evaluates patient-specific integration of radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with emphasis on quantitative imaging, absorbed-dose estimation, spatial registration, biological interpretation, adaptation thresholds, and reporting. We performed a targeted search of PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S. Food and Drug Administration records, professional-society guidance, and reference lists for English-language evidence available through 31 July 2026, prioritizing guidelines, regulatory documents, randomized and prospective trials, technical validation studies, and clinically informative retrospective series. Established RPT platforms are distinguished from investigational combined-modality applications and emerging or speculative technologies. Liver-directed Y-90 radioembolization combined with focal EBRT remains the most developed model, whereas head and neck, prostate, meningioma, lymphoma, and bone-dominant strategies illustrate distinct clinical geometries and levels of readiness. Across platforms, direct addition of absorbed dose in gray (Gy) is a geometric description, not automatically a biological endpoint; biologically effective dose (BED) and equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) should be treated as model-based estimates with explicit assumptions. Future theranostic radiation medicine should therefore be built on prospective trials with prespecified dosimetry, uncertainty analysis, adaptation rules, and shared cross-modality reporting standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.