ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Return to Sport After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: From Time-Based Clearance to Sport-Specific Readiness.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Static Plantar-Load Distribution and Stabilometry in Children and Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis Under Different Testing Conditions: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Return to sport (RTS) is an important outcome after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), yet postoperative clearance remains largely time-based and reported outcomes vary according to procedure, population, endpoint, and treating-center policy. This critical review integrates direct postoperative RTS cohorts with biomechanical, rehabilitation, psychological, safety, and clinical-guidance evidence. Most available data concern adolescents treated with posterior spinal fusion and rely on self-reported participation. Resumption of physical activity or sport is common within the first postoperative year, but return to the same discipline, previous competitive level, and objectively verified performance is less consistently demonstrated. Evidence for anterior fusion is sparse, whereas vertebral body tethering is supported by smaller, selected cohorts and should be interpreted separately. Associations between RTS and distal fusion level or construct characteristics remain inconsistent, and biomechanical studies suggest redistribution rather than normalization of movement. Reported sport-related complications are uncommon, but existing cohorts are too small and lack exposure denominators to quantify rare events. No universal safe date or validated AIS-specific readiness battery currently exists. The proposed Multidimensional Scoliosis Return-to-Sport Framework therefore uses elapsed time as safety context while integrating clinical recovery, physical and psychological readiness, graded sport-specific exposure, and distinct return outcomes. The framework is evidence-informed and requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.