ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Psychosocial Well-Being at Work: Large-Sample Structural Validation of the Multidimensional Psychosocial Work Experience Scale for Employed Persons (MPWES).
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychosocial working conditions are important determinants of employee health, work ability, and organizational sustainability, yet existing instruments often assess job demands, job resources, psychosocial risks, or well-being outcomes separately. This study examined the structural validity of the Multidimensional Psychosocial Work Experience Scale for Employed Persons (MPWES), an instrument designed to assess a multidimensional occupational psychosocial profile comprising workplace conditions and demands, psychosocial resources, adverse exposures, health-related experiences, and subjective functioning. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among 1631 employees from the pharmaceutical, energy, healthcare, and administrative sectors in Latvia. Confirmatory factor analysis with the robust WLSMV estimator was used to test the predefined measurement model. The refined eight-factor model demonstrated acceptable fit in the calibration subsample (N = 400; CFI = 0.930, TLI = 0.922, RMSEA = 0.066, SRMR = 0.078) and was replicated in the held-out validation subsample (N = 1231; CFI = 0.911, TLI = 0.901, RMSEA = 0.068, SRMR = 0.067). Reliability indices were acceptable for several domains, although some factors showed modest or borderline values. Discriminant validity was supported, with all HTMT values below 0.85, and measurement invariance testing supported configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance across samples. The findings provide initial evidence of the MPWES's structural validity and measurement stability in the present sample. However, further studies using external validity criteria, longitudinal designs, and culturally diverse samples are needed before the scale can be considered fully validated for broader occupational and public health applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.