Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42652395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Psychosocial Well-Being at Work: Large-Sample Structural Validation of the Multidimensional Psychosocial Work Experience Scale for Employed Persons (MPWES).

Evija Nagle, Iluta Skrūzkalne, Maksims Zolovs, Jeļena Perevozčikova, Otto Andersen, Andrejs Ivanovs, Ieva Reine

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Evija NagleStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Iluta SkrūzkalneStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0004-1763-4218
Maksims ZolovsStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-9120-5869
Jeļena PerevozčikovaStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Otto AndersenSchool of Business and Law, University of Agder, Gimlemoen 25, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.
Andrejs IvanovsStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-3776
Ieva ReineStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychosocial working conditions are important determinants of employee health, work ability, and organizational sustainability, yet existing instruments often assess job demands, job resources, psychosocial risks, or well-being outcomes separately. This study examined the structural validity of the Multidimensional Psychosocial Work Experience Scale for Employed Persons (MPWES), an instrument designed to assess a multidimensional occupational psychosocial profile comprising workplace conditions and demands, psychosocial resources, adverse exposures, health-related experiences, and subjective functioning. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among 1631 employees from the pharmaceutical, energy, healthcare, and administrative sectors in Latvia. Confirmatory factor analysis with the robust WLSMV estimator was used to test the predefined measurement model. The refined eight-factor model demonstrated acceptable fit in the calibration subsample (N = 400; CFI = 0.930, TLI = 0.922, RMSEA = 0.066, SRMR = 0.078) and was replicated in the held-out validation subsample (N = 1231; CFI = 0.911, TLI = 0.901, RMSEA = 0.068, SRMR = 0.067). Reliability indices were acceptable for several domains, although some factors showed modest or borderline values. Discriminant validity was supported, with all HTMT values below 0.85, and measurement invariance testing supported configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance across samples. The findings provide initial evidence of the MPWES's structural validity and measurement stability in the present sample. However, further studies using external validity criteria, longitudinal designs, and culturally diverse samples are needed before the scale can be considered fully validated for broader occupational and public health applications.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking Conditionsconfirmatory factor analysisemployee well-beingjob demands–resources modelmeasurement invarianceoccupational healthpsychosocial risk assessmentpsychosocial well-beingpublic healthscale validationworking environment

Identifiers

PMID42652395
PMCPMC13513784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.