ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Extreme Heat and Emergency Health Impacts in the US (2018-2025).
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Future climate projections suggest an increase in heat-related mortality and a decrease in cold-related deaths under warming scenarios. Understanding the health impacts of extreme heat, and their implications for healthcare demand is essential for assessing the future burden of climate-related illnesses. In this study, we examined the relationship between extreme heat events and Emergency Department Visits (EDV) for heat-related illnesses (HRIs) across the United States from 2018 to 2025. Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Heat and Health Tracker and other relevant sources, we analyzed EDV rates standardized to 100,000 population. We aggregated daily into the 10 U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Regions. We used 0.5° × 0.5° gridded maximum daily temperature data (aggregated to HHS regions with proportional area weighting) and daily maximum heat index extracted from the CDC data portal (estimated using the US National Weather Service methodology and aggregated to HHS regions using total population weighting) to characterize seasonal patterns and regional variability. The association between peak heat events and EDV time series was explored using log-linear mixed-effects models, which accounted for seasonal trends, climate variables, and their regional variability. Random effects were used to capture regional heterogeneity in predictor-response relationships, accommodating variation in associations across regions. Model performance was evaluated using prediction error metrics and goodness-of-fit assessments. Maximum temperature and heat index were both significant predictors, with the heat index offering a slightly better fit. Associations were largely contemporaneous, with peak correlations at lag zero, underscoring the need for real-time response. EDV increased several days before peak environmental conditions, consistent with early exposure effects. While temperature-EDV relationships varied regionally, heat index associations were more stable. This work underscores the urgent need for regionally adaptive public health strategies in the face of intensifying climate extremes and outlines future directions for research and policy to strengthen health systems' preparedness in a warming world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.