ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Rethinking Clinical Visibility in Autistic Females: Autistic Camouflaging and Menstrual Cycle Variability.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (hereafter autism) is increasingly recognised as being underdiagnosed in females worldwide, contributing to inequalities in clinical visibility and access to appropriate care. The clinical visibility of autism in females is influenced by diagnostic practices historically developed using predominantly male samples, which may be less sensitive to less overt or more socially camouflaged presentations. Greater levels of autistic camouflaging, including masking, compensations, and assimilation, have been proposed as one factor contributing to differences in the presentation of autism between males and females. However, camouflaging is resource-intensive, associated with significant psychological costs, and varies across contexts. Because camouflaging relies on cognitive-emotional resources, it may also fluctuate under conditions that influence these resources, such as the menstrual cycle. To date, no empirical research has directly investigated this relationship. This opinion article proposes the conceptual hypothesis that menstrual cycle-related fluctuations may influence the cognitive-emotional resources required for autistic camouflaging, with potential implications for clinical visibility, diagnostic recognition, mental health, and equitable access to care. By synthesising indirect evidence from autism, camouflaging, and menstrual health research, this conceptual framework aims to guide future empirical investigation and highlights the urgent need to better understand this overlooked intersection to improve diagnostic equity, clinical recognition, and women's health outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.