Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42652321›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Rethinking Clinical Visibility in Autistic Females: Autistic Camouflaging and Menstrual Cycle Variability.

Gabrielle A Grant, Alana Gall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabrielle A GrantNational Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Military Road, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-0934-6582
Alana GallNational Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Military Road, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2503-2696

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2042563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (hereafter autism) is increasingly recognised as being underdiagnosed in females worldwide, contributing to inequalities in clinical visibility and access to appropriate care. The clinical visibility of autism in females is influenced by diagnostic practices historically developed using predominantly male samples, which may be less sensitive to less overt or more socially camouflaged presentations. Greater levels of autistic camouflaging, including masking, compensations, and assimilation, have been proposed as one factor contributing to differences in the presentation of autism between males and females. However, camouflaging is resource-intensive, associated with significant psychological costs, and varies across contexts. Because camouflaging relies on cognitive-emotional resources, it may also fluctuate under conditions that influence these resources, such as the menstrual cycle. To date, no empirical research has directly investigated this relationship. This opinion article proposes the conceptual hypothesis that menstrual cycle-related fluctuations may influence the cognitive-emotional resources required for autistic camouflaging, with potential implications for clinical visibility, diagnostic recognition, mental health, and equitable access to care. By synthesising indirect evidence from autism, camouflaging, and menstrual health research, this conceptual framework aims to guide future empirical investigation and highlights the urgent need to better understand this overlooked intersection to improve diagnostic equity, clinical recognition, and women's health outcomes globally.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderMenstrual CycleFemaleHumansautism in womenautism spectrum disorderautistic camouflagingdiagnostic inequitylate autism diagnosismenstrual cyclemental healthneurodivergencewomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID42652321
PMCPMC13512405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.