ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Mapping Eco-Affective Health: A Spatial Framework for Climate-Related Emotional Responses and Mental Health in Urban Systems.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward human-centred resilience quantification: The role of eco-affective state variables.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban environments concentrate spatially distributed stressors, including heat, noise, pollution, and biodiversity loss, that are increasingly recognized as determinants of population mental health. However, current approaches rarely integrate environmental structure, lived exposure, and climate-related emotional responses within a unified spatial framework applicable to public health. This article introduces Eco-Affective Health Mapping (EAHM) as a conceptual, spatially explicit framework, grounded in the recently formalized Eco-Affective Health theoretical model, for understanding how environmental conditions may shape climate-related emotional responses, including eco-anxiety, solastalgia, and ecological grief, across urban socio-ecological systems. Drawing on evidence from spatial epidemiology, landscape ecology, environmental mental health, and digital phenotyping, I argue that affective responses to environmental stressors are not randomly distributed but are hypothesized to exhibit spatial clustering in relation to environmental exposures, landscape configuration, and mobility-based interactions. I propose the Eco-Affective Health Mapping (EAHM) framework, which integrates four spatial layers: environmental exposures, landscape configuration, person-place interaction, and affective indicators, together with a companion composite metric, the Eco-Affective Load Index (EALI), for which I provide a formal multi-domain specification and a purely illustrative, non-empirical worked example. EAHM is presented here as a theoretical and methodological proposal rather than as a validated instrument: no primary environmental, mobility, or affective data were collected or analyzed for this article, and the framework's constituent relationships require prospective empirical testing, for which I outline a companion measurement strategy grounded in the Eco-Affective Health Assessment Protocol (EAHAP). By conceptualizing climate-related emotional responses as candidate measurable public health signals, EAHM is intended to support a future shift toward prevention-oriented, population-level mental health strategies aligned with planetary health and sustainable development agendas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.