ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Overwhelmed and Unnoticed-Burnout in Biomedical Scientists: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical scientists/researchers are critical to advancing human health, but their experiences of occupational stress, burnout, and subsequent consequences are surmised but understudied. The current narrative review aimed to search and summarize existing literature and scientific discourse specific to biomedical scientist burnout to better understand the prevalence and unique drivers of stress in this population and highlight critical areas that require further research and intervention efforts. The authors searched six primary databases from August 2024 to December 2025 using defined search terms to identify peer-reviewed articles and scientific discourse related to occupational burnout of academic medicine biomedical faculty researchers, postdoctoral researchers, or lab personnel. Prevalence and primary drivers of burnout, stress mediators, and mitigation/intervention recommendations were extracted from the included works. A total of 16 empirical articles and 4 non-empirical works were included. Over 30% of biomedical scientists exhibit high occupational burnout, nearly 45% report high distress, and just over 34% experience high emotional exhaustion. Seven primary drivers of biomedical scientist distress were identified including intense workloads/expectations, funding pressures, and lack of perceived organizational support/recognition. Biomedical scientist burnout prevalence appears comparable to clinical faculty but is driven, in part, by distinct stressors. The attributable organization and societal cost of biomedical scientist burnout remain unquantified. The current review establishes a significant need for further research and tailored efforts to address the distinct needs of biomedical scientists across academic medical centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.