ReviewBiomedicines2026
Are Signal Peptides Hidden Regulators of Neurodegenerative Disease?
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Canonical signal peptides (SPs) are short N-terminal sequences that direct nascent proteins into the secretory pathway, but their role extends far beyond protein targeting. Advances in sequencing and computational tools have enabled their systematic identification across proteomes, highlighting SPs as critical regulators of protein biogenesis, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) targeting, translocation, folding, and proteostasis. Clinically, mutations affecting SP function underlie a distinct group of human disorders, while SP-derived fragments are emerging as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. In biotechnology, SPs are engineered to enhance recombinant protein production and serve as molecular tags for intracellular delivery. Together, these developments position SPs at the intersection of fundamental cell biology, medicine, and biotechnology. While this review primarily focuses on canonical SPs, it also considers selected non-canonical targeting and topogenic sequences whose dysfunction contributes to protein misfolding, impaired ER translocation, disrupted degradation pathways, and altered intracellular trafficking in neurodegenerative diseases. Aberrations involving both conventional SPs and alternative targeting/topogenic elements contribute to pathological protein aggregation, a hallmark of major neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington Disease (HD), prion diseases, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD); in multiple sclerosis (MS) is primarily an inflammatory demyelinating disease, where abnormal protein exposure, potentially linked to misprocessed SPs, can activate immune responses. By synthesizing current knowledge, the review explores how alterations in targeting determinants influence key proteostasis pathways, acting as upstream modulators of disease-relevant molecular cascades. It further discusses the emerging concept that SP-derived fragments may participate in intercellular communication, adding an additional layer of regulatory complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.