ReviewBiomedicines2026
Engineering Plant-Derived Exosome-like Nanoparticles as Bioinspired Nanocarriers: From Physicochemical Properties to Tumor Delivery Performance.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant-derived exosome-like nanoparticles (PELNs) are lipid bilayer nanostructures containing endogenous lipids, proteins, nucleic acids, and phytochemicals, which have attracted increasing interest as bioinspired carriers for cancer therapy. This review evaluates how plant source, isolation, purification procedures, vesicle composition, cargo-loading strategy, and administration route shape the quality and tumor-delivery performance of PELNs. The available evidence indicates that plant source and processing are major determinants of particle size, purity, surface charge, cargo profile, and biological activity. Ultracentrifugation remains widely used but is limited by contaminant co-isolation and poor scalability, whereas density-gradient purification and size-exclusion chromatography improve purity, and ultrafiltration and tangential flow filtration offer greater potential for large-scale manufacturing. Passive incubation generally preserves vesicle integrity and is most suitable for hydrophobic small molecules, whereas electroporation, sonication, and extrusion can increase cargo loading but may cause aggregation, membrane remodeling, or loss of endogenous components. Preclinical studies suggest that PELNs can exert intrinsic antitumor effects, modulate the tumor microenvironment, improve chemotherapeutic delivery, and help overcome drug resistance. However, evidence for in vivo tumor-targeting remains less robust than evidence for cellular uptake, and direct comparisons with established nanocarriers remain scarce. Clinical translation will require standardized nomenclature and characterization, reproducible manufacturing, quantitative loading and release assays, route-specific biodistribution studies, and repeated-dose safety evaluation. These findings provide a framework for the rational development of PELNs as reproducible tumor-oriented nanocarriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.