ReviewBiomedicines2026
COPD Stability and Asthma Remission: Different Words for the Same Therapeutic Ambition?
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic goals related to chronic airway diseases are evolving from short-term symptom control toward sustained suppression of disease activity and prevention of future risk. In severe asthma, this shift has been captured by the concept of clinical remission, generally defined by absence of exacerbations, no need for oral corticosteroids, symptom control, and stable or improved lung function. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the analogous concept has more often been described as disease stability. Although remission in asthma and stability in COPD have developed within different biological and clinical frameworks, they may reflect disease-specific expressions of the same therapeutic ambition. Recent studies support COPD stability as a measurable and clinically meaningful state, associated with reduced exacerbation risk and mortality. Evidence from optimized inhaled triple therapy, particularly with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol, indicates that multidimensional stability can be achieved and maintained in a proportion of patients, while real-world studies reinforce its applicability beyond randomized trials. The emergence of biologic therapies for selected patients with eosinophilic or type 2 COPD further strengthens the rationale for considering stability as an ambitious treatment target. In this narrative review, informed by a structured literature search, we discuss the conceptual relationship between asthma remission and COPD stability, and summarize the evidence supporting disease stability as an attainable and prognostically relevant outcome. In addition, we propose a pragmatic multidimensional definition based on symptom stability, absence of moderate or severe exacerbations, no systemic corticosteroid use, and maintained lung function over 12 months. COPD stability should not be viewed as a weaker goal than asthma remission, but rather as the most appropriate COPD-specific expression of sustained low disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.