ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Reannotation-Free Automatic Recognition Methods for Empty Camera Trap Images Based on MegaDetector Optimization.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Camera traps are widely used in wildlife surveys but often generate numerous empty images due to false triggers, which are time-consuming to filter manually. Microsoft's MegaDetector (MD) is commonly applied for empty image filtering; however, setting its confidence threshold is challenging because a high threshold increases the false negative rate (FNR), whereas a low threshold raises the false positive rate (FPR), making it difficult to achieve a satisfactory trade-off between the two. To address this dilemma, we proposed three MD-based methods with different performance and computational requirements. For FNR-sensitive users, we proposed MD_CS, which integrated context image similarity to achieve a very low FNR while controlling the FPR. For FPR-sensitive users, we proposed MD_CL, which used MD to generate supervisory signals for training a classification model, thereby reducing the FPR while controlling the FNR. For users requiring both low FNR and low FPR, we proposed MD_CS_CL, an ensemble method that combined the strengths of MD_CS and MD_CL. Experimental results on multiple datasets showed that these three methods achieved a significantly better balance between FNR and FPR compared to the threshold adjustment method of the MD method. Specifically, MD_CS maintained an FNR of 1.8-5.9% while controlling the FPR at 4.9-8.5%; MD_CL kept the FPR at 0.4-2.6% while controlling the FNR at 3.8-8.4%; MD_CS_CL achieved an optimal balance with an FNR of 1.4-4.0% and an FPR of 0.3-0.9%. On a server equipped with an RTX 4090 GPU, the three methods processed 6.7, 5.4, and 4.0 images per second, respectively, and none required manual annotation. Consequently, the proposed methods reduce labor costs, improve work efficiency, and provide reliable technical support for large-scale wildlife monitoring by achieving a superior FNR-FPR trade-off compared to MD's traditional threshold regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.