ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Assessment of Small Mammal Communities in Forested Areas of the Sintra-Cascais Natural Park (Portugal).
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For this project, we surveyed small mammal communities in protected forest habitats of the Sintra-Cascais Natural Park, Portugal, to establish a robust baseline for conservation planning. Our study provides a dataset and accompanying information to support an empirical framework for assessing the environmental determinants of small mammal occurrence across diverse habitats. These habitats encompass the park's main forested areas within the UNESCO-designated landscape of the Sintra Mountain Range. Field sampling was conducted in two periods (2018 and 2024-2025) across six areas, comprising a total of 43 sites representative of the dominant habitat types within each location. A combination of live trapping, hair sampling, and camera trapping was employed, which enabled the detection of ten small mammal species, four Eulipotyphla and six Rodentia. The final dataset, derived from an extensive sampling effort of 8820 trap-nights, comprises a total of 792 specimen records. The complementary sampling approaches contributed differently to species detection, with live trapping recording the highest species richness and camera trapping generating the greatest number of detections. Obtained data provide critical support to inform the design and implementation of integrated, evidence-based conservation actions to sustain stable small mammal populations over the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.