Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651993›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Fatty-Acid Composition and Sensory Traits of Japanese Local Chickens in the Context of Asian Local Chicken Meat Quality.

Hideaki Takahashi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hideaki TakahashiNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-8517, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8245-6949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asian local chickens are often perceived as more palatable than commercial broilers, with stronger taste and longer aftertaste, but the biochemical basis of this eating quality remains unclear. Using Japanese local chicken meat as the main example and other Asian local chicken studies as context, this hypothesis-generating review develops a hypothesis centered on arachidonic acid. The core hypothesis is that higher arachidonic acid content may partly explain why local chicken meat is perceived as more palatable. Available Japanese data show that local chicken meats generally contain higher arachidonic acid proportions than commercial broiler meat. However, higher arachidonic acid content alone cannot explain why the meat is perceived as more palatable. A previously proposed hypothesis links lipid-derived volatile aldehydes to kokumi through activation of the calcium-sensing receptor. This route is treated cautiously here, because volatile aldehydes may be lost during cooking and have not yet been shown to remain in cooked chicken meat at concentrations that influence eating quality. Instead, this review proposes a second validation route. Arachidonic-acid-rich lipid pools generate 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and related compounds that are less volatile and more likely to remain in edible fractions than short-chain aldehydes. These compounds are introduced here only as plausible downstream oxidation products that may help connect meat lipid composition with kokumi-related or aftertaste-related perception. This review emphasizes production context, meat-quality traits, and sensory evaluation as the primary basis for interpreting fatty-acid differences, with chemical hypotheses presented only as exploratory routes for future validation.

Indexed as

arachidonic acidAsian local chickensfatty-acid compositionJAS-certified chickensnative-breed ancestrypoultry meat qualityrearing systemssensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42651993
PMCPMC13508959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.