In one paragraphArticle in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
8 authors.
Yan HeKey Laboratory of Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3879-4091 Xiaoyan LiuKey Laboratory of Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Kexin XuKey Laboratory of Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Zheng YanKey Laboratory of Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-6134 Rongping WeiKey Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Chengdu 611830, China.ORCID 0009-0000-9457-7254 Mingyue ZhangThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu 611830, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-1655 Guiquan ZhangKey Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Chengdu 611830, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-7036 Dingzhen LiuKey Laboratory of Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1870-6197 Funding
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding 2024CPB-B15China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda Project CCRCGP-222301National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270506National Natural Science Foundation of China 32470495
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Mate choice can vary with internal condition, but whether gut microbial variation is associated with female mate-choice-related olfactory preferences remains poorly understood. In this study, we tested whether dietary dried yeast supplementation was associated with changes in gut microbiota and odor preference in captive female giant pandas (
Indexed as
exploration preferencegiant pandagut microbiotaolfactory preference
Identifiers
PMID42651979
PMCPMC13508970
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390