Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651966›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Evaluating the Visibility of Power-Line Bird-Collision Warning Devices Using an Avian Spectral-Response Weighting Model.

Mengxuan Li, Wenbin Li, Geng Huang, Yanjun Kuang, Zhi Yang, Jing Hu, Yifei Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengxuan LiState Grid Electric Power Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100069, China.
Wenbin LiState Grid Electric Power Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100069, China.
Geng HuangSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Yanjun KuangState Grid Jiangxi Electric Power Research Institute, Nanchang 330096, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3839-9984
Zhi YangState Grid Electric Power Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100069, China.
Jing HuState Grid Jiangxi Electric Power Research Institute, Nanchang 330096, China.
Yifei JiaSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China (Grant No. 521800250019-400-ZN) "Key Technologies for Activity Hotspot Identification and Safeguarding of Large Rare Wading Birds in Power Transmission Corridor" 521800250019-400-ZN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collisions with overhead power lines are an important source of avian mortality, particularly for migratory and large-bodied birds. Although warning devices are widely installed to increase line visibility, their image-based visibility across viewing distances and directions remains poorly quantified. We evaluated eight power-line bird-collision warning devices using UAV-based multispectral imaging and an avian spectral-response weighting model. Images were acquired at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 m under upward-looking, horizontal, and downward-looking viewing geometries. A composite visibility score quantified target-background separation within the multispectral images. Raw mean visibility increased from 0.351 at 5 m to 0.484 at 50 m; however, the distance effect was not significant after accounting for viewing angle and heterogeneous residual variance. Viewing angle was the dominant source of variation at 20-50 m, with substantially higher visibility under downward-looking views than under horizontal and upward-looking views. A significant distance × viewing-angle interaction further showed that distance-response patterns differed among viewing geometries: visibility increased with distance under downward-looking views but remained consistently low under horizontal and upward-looking views. The relative performance of the tested devices also changed under low-visibility conditions, with the self-luminous tag and circular tag B attaining the highest condition-standardized mean scores. These findings identify viewing geometry as a critical determinant of warning-device visibility and demonstrate that averages pooled across observation conditions can obscure important performance differences. Evaluation and deployment should therefore prioritize device visibility from below and during near-horizontal viewing, particularly for overhead ground or shield wires at medium and long distances. This condition-specific framework provides a quantitative basis for improving the design and placement of power-line bird-collision warning devices.

Indexed as

bird collisioncollision mitigationmultispectral imagingpower linevisibilitywarning device

Identifiers

PMID42651966
PMCPMC13508915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.