ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Health Status Recognition of Yellow-Feathered Broilers in Floor-Rearing Environments via Whole-Body and Comb Feature Fusion.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In commercial floor-rearing environments for yellow-feathered broilers, visual screening of broilers with observable health-related abnormalities is challenged by low illumination, individual occlusion, and the limited use of local comb information. This study proposes a two-stage global-local framework for yellow-feathered broilers. Images were collected from one commercial floor-rearing farm; after screening, 1463 images were used for key-region localization, and 2031 samples were constructed for health-status recognition. Samples were labeled as Healthy or Unhealthy by expert consensus according to observable phenotypic characteristics, rather than veterinary-confirmed disease diagnoses. First, a Dual-Target YOLO (DT-YOLO) model localized whole-body and comb regions. Second, a Transformer network integrated features from paired or single available inputs for classification. DT-YOLO achieved a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 97.56% at the 0.5 IoU threshold. For paired whole-body-comb inputs, the proposed classification model achieved an Accuracy of 97.11%, Macro-Precision of 97.38%, Macro-Recall of 96.58%, and Macro-F1 of 96.95%. Under the mixed-input condition, the model maintained an Accuracy of 96.06% and a Macro-F1 of 96.02%. These findings indicate that combining whole-body and comb information can support visual screening of unhealthy broilers under the single-farm floor-rearing conditions represented in the current dataset. Its applicability to other farms, breeds, and management conditions requires independent external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.