ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Preparing Therapy Dogs for Animal-Assisted Services: Governance, Welfare-Centred Preparation, and a Lifecycle Research Agenda Across Selected European and United States Frameworks.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dog-assisted services are employed in healthcare, educational, social-care, and community settings, yet systems for preparing and protecting therapy dogs remain unevenly developed. This narrative review synthesises empirical, conceptual, and governance literature on therapy dog preparation in selected European contexts and the United States. Searches were conducted across academic databases, specialist repositories, and grey-literature sources, with evidence organised thematically around governance, candidate selection, training, handler competency, welfare monitoring, health and zoonotic risk management, and career lifecycle management. The synthesis shows that therapy dog governance remains fragmented, with international guidance, voluntary certification systems, national guideline frameworks, and legally embedded models differing in scope, enforceability, welfare safeguards, handler requirements, and re-evaluation. Across preparation domains, the review identifies a need to move beyond dog-level pass-fail certification toward assessment of the human-dog team within specific intervention contexts. Reward-based and consent-oriented preparation, multimodal welfare monitoring, handler stress recognition, veterinary screening, infection control procedures, workload regulation, and retirement planning emerge as central but inconsistently standardised requirements. The review proposes a tiered lifecycle framework conceptualising therapy dog readiness as a dynamic, welfare-centred, context-dependent process from selection through active service and retirement. Future research should prioritise longitudinal welfare assessment, validated selection and handler competency tools, comparative governance evaluation, positive welfare indicators, and transparent reporting of preparation variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.