ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
UGT-YOLO: A Multi-Strategy Fusion Model for Automated Dairy Cow Body Condition Scoring.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dairy cow body condition score (BCS) is a practical, semi-quantitative indicator of body energy reserves and changes in energy balance. To improve five-class BCS detection under complex imaging conditions, this study developed UGT-YOLO by integrating a UniRepLKNet Block, a Gather-and-Distribute feature-fusion mechanism, and a Task-Aligned Dynamic Detection Head into YOLOv11n. The model was evaluated using a single publicly available dataset containing five adjacent BCS classes: 3.25, 3.50, 3.75, 4.00, and 4.25. Following redundancy removal and image-quality screening, 7015 original images were retained. Dataset partitioning was completed before data augmentation. The original images were divided at the source-video-sequence level into training, validation, and test subsets containing 5612, 702, and 701 images, respectively. Available cow identifiers were additionally used to keep images of the same identified animal within a single subset. Data augmentation was applied exclusively to the training subset, increasing the training set to 9639 images and producing a final experimental dataset of 11,042 images. UGT-YOLO achieved a precision of 84.3%, a recall of 81.1%, an mAP@0.5 of 88.5%, and an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 66.8%. Compared with YOLOv11n, these values increased by 4.8, 0.9, 2.8, and 4.5 percentage points, respectively. The parameter count increased from 2.6 to 6.5 million, and computational cost increased from 6.4 to 19.2 GFLOPs. Under an input resolution of 640 × 640 pixels, a batch size of 1, and FP32 inference on an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, UGT-YOLO achieved a throughput of 68 frames s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.