Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651878›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

How Do Women and Domestic Animals Share Parturition Pain? A Systematic Review.

Ada Rota, Chiara Ottino, Alessia Bertero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ada RotaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
Chiara OttinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-5905-8931
Alessia BerteroDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8181-5866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parturition is associated with pain in all mammals, yet our understanding of this physiological process differs considerably between women and animals. In women, parturition pain has been extensively investigated, whereas in domestic animals it remains poorly characterized, despite its potential implications for maternal welfare and neonatal outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate evidence on physiological pain during natural parturition in domestic animals and to compare it with that reported in women using observer-based assessment methods. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 31 March 2026. Eligible studies assessed parturition pain using behavioural, physiological, or biochemical indicators. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria (18 animal, 11 human studies). In domestic animals, most investigations focused on behavioural and endocrine responses associated with dystocia or postpartum discomfort rather than on the intensity of intrapartum pain itself. The strongest evidence of severe pain during the expulsive phase was reported in goats and sows. In women, observer-based assessment methods were limited and heterogeneous. In conclusion, the available evidence is consistent with a nociceptive component of labour across species; however, it remains insufficient to quantify physiological parturition pain in most domestic animals or justify routine analgesic treatment solely on welfare grounds. The development and validation of species-specific multidimensional tools for parturition pain assessment should therefore be considered a research priority.

Indexed as

animal welfarebehavioural pain scalesdomestic animalslabour painpain assessmentparturition painphysiological painwoman

Identifiers

PMID42651878
PMCPMC13508949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.