ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
How Do Women and Domestic Animals Share Parturition Pain? A Systematic Review.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parturition is associated with pain in all mammals, yet our understanding of this physiological process differs considerably between women and animals. In women, parturition pain has been extensively investigated, whereas in domestic animals it remains poorly characterized, despite its potential implications for maternal welfare and neonatal outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate evidence on physiological pain during natural parturition in domestic animals and to compare it with that reported in women using observer-based assessment methods. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 31 March 2026. Eligible studies assessed parturition pain using behavioural, physiological, or biochemical indicators. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria (18 animal, 11 human studies). In domestic animals, most investigations focused on behavioural and endocrine responses associated with dystocia or postpartum discomfort rather than on the intensity of intrapartum pain itself. The strongest evidence of severe pain during the expulsive phase was reported in goats and sows. In women, observer-based assessment methods were limited and heterogeneous. In conclusion, the available evidence is consistent with a nociceptive component of labour across species; however, it remains insufficient to quantify physiological parturition pain in most domestic animals or justify routine analgesic treatment solely on welfare grounds. The development and validation of species-specific multidimensional tools for parturition pain assessment should therefore be considered a research priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.