ArticleBiology2026
Bioinformatic Identification and Experimental Validation of a Prognostic Transcriptional Signature Derived from Asparagine Metabolism-Related Genes in Breast Cancer.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer (BRCA) possesses prominent molecular heterogeneity, where aberrant expression of genes annotated to asparagine metabolism networks drives malignant progression and therapeutic resistance. However, systematic construction of prognostic signatures from a holistic asparagine metabolic pathway perspective remains scarce, limiting the clinical translation of metabolic insights into prognostic tools. We integrated TCGA and GEO BRCA transcriptomic datasets to screen asparagine metabolism-related differentially expressed genes and build a prognostic model. Six biomarkers, SLC35A2, SRD5A2, NT5E, CEL, IFNG and CNR1, were selected via univariate Cox, LASSO and multivariate Cox regression. SRD5A2 and IFNG were enriched in low-risk patients, while the other four genes were upregulated in high-risk subgroups. This signature reliably stratifies patient prognosis, with risk scores correlating strongly with pathway activity, immune infiltration, immune checkpoints, mutation landscapes and drug responsiveness. Bioinformatic results were validated via TCGA cohort analysis, in vitro cellular assays and Western blot. Two in vivo models were established: 4T1 xenografts in 6-week-old BALB/c mice and DMBA/hormone-induced spontaneous breast tumors in 8-week-old SD rats. Tumors were generated by cell injection or DMBA gavage plus cyclic hormone treatment, and tissue sections were processed for immunohistochemistry. Consistent differential expression of the six core genes was validated across all in vitro and in vivo systems. In conclusion, this asparagine metabolism-associated signature offers candidate biomarkers for personalized prognosis and provides preclinical evidence for metabolism-targeted BRCA therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.