Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651735›Full record

ReviewBiology2026

Nanoparticles: Small Interventions for Major Challenges in Aquaculture.

Laura González-Rodríguez, Patricia Pereiro, Beatriz Novoa, Antonio Figueras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura González-RodríguezInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM-CSIC), C/Eduardo Cabello, 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain.
Patricia PereiroInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM-CSIC), C/Eduardo Cabello, 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8734-3334
Beatriz NovoaInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM-CSIC), C/Eduardo Cabello, 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4888-8419
Antonio FiguerasInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM-CSIC), C/Eduardo Cabello, 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0617-0030

Funding

Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities Programa de Ciencias Marinas de Galicia; Complementary Science Plans of the Ministry of Science and Innovation included in the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan (PRTR-C17.I1).Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spain PID2023-148810OB-C21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquaculture has emerged as one of the fastest-growing sectors of global food production, driven by population growth, consumer demand, and technological innovation. Despite this expansion, the industry continues to face persistent challenges, including disease management, optimizing growth and product quality, maintaining water quality, and mitigating environmental impacts. Nanotechnology has recently emerged as a promising tool to tackle these issues, offering both direct applications, such as antimicrobial agents, immunostimulants, and optimized drug delivery to enhance fish health, and indirect applications, including post-harvest processing, environmental monitoring, and contaminant removal. This review provides a comprehensive overview of nanoparticle applications in aquaculture from 2020 to early 2026, covering the various types of nanoparticles, their mechanisms of action, and the specific materials investigated during this period. The discussion also addresses potential benefits, limitations, and biosafety concerns, emphasizing the need for further in vivo and field studies to ensure the safe and sustainable integration of nanotechnologies into aquaculture practices.

Indexed as

aquacultureconsumer safetyenvironmental remediationfish healthnanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID42651735
PMCPMC13509483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.