ArticleBiology2026
Design and Biological Evaluation of ALKBH2 and ALKBH5 Inhibitors as Adjuvants to Temozolomide-Based Glioblastoma Treatment.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study reports the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel inhibitors targeting the epigenetic enzymes ALKBH2 and ALKBH5 as potential adjuvants to temozolomide therapy in glioblastoma. Given their critical role in DNA/RNA demethylation, tumor progression, and drug resistance, their inhibition represents a promising therapeutic strategy. Building on the previously identified lead compound MV1035, we employed structure-based drug design to develop new derivatives, including a second-generation series incorporating a fumarate hydrazide moiety to enhance binding affinity through interaction with both substrate- and cofactor-binding sites. Molecular docking studies predicted significantly improved binding for a set of new compounds but, due to multiple synthetic drawbacks, only a subset of the designed series was synthesized and evaluated biologically. MV3030 emerged as the most promising candidate. MV3030 demonstrated an inhibitory effect on ALKBH2 comparable to MV1035, also showing a more moderate inhibitory effect on ALKBH5. Notably, it exhibited intrinsic cytotoxicity in U87-MG cells and patient-derived glioma stem cells, whereas normal astrocytes exhibited markedly higher resistance to the treatment. Furthermore, MV3030 enhanced temozolomide efficacy and displayed favorable blood-brain barrier permeability both in silico and in vitro. Moreover, MV3030 modulated the FoxM1/Wnt/β-catenin axis. Overall, these findings identify MV3030 as a promising compound with the potential to overcome temozolomide resistance and improve glioblastoma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.