ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
From Traditional Inspection to Quantitative Imaging: Tongue and Facial Color Features for Automated Machine Learning-Driven Depression and Schizophrenia Classification.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective and non-invasive markers for psychiatric assessment remain limited. This study evaluated whether standardized tongue and facial color features provide measurable information relevant to depression and schizophrenia classification. Tongue and facial images were collected from 749 participants, including healthy controls (n = 84), patients with depression (n = 246), and patients with schizophrenia (n = 419). Color characteristics were quantified in predefined tongue and facial regions using the LAB color space. Group differences were examined statistically, and machine-learning models were evaluated across five repeated stratified splits. Most LAB-derived features differed significantly across groups, with luminance-related measures showing the largest effect sizes and more consistent shifts in schizophrenia than in depression. In multiclass classification, LAB plus demographic variables achieved strong performance (accuracy = 0.782 ± 0.035, macro-F1 = 0.697 ± 0.038, AUC = 0.912 ± 0.027), similar to LAB plus demographic and traditional variables (AUC = 0.912 ± 0.032). LAB-only models showed comparable AUC to demographic-only models but lower macro-F1. In pairwise analyses, discrimination was strongest for healthy control versus schizophrenia (AUC = 0.952 ± 0.030) and depression versus schizophrenia (AUC = 0.926 ± 0.019), and lower for healthy control versus depression (AUC = 0.817 ± 0.054). These findings suggest that LAB-derived tongue and facial color features may provide complementary group-level information, particularly when combined with demographic variables, but should not be interpreted as standalone diagnostic biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.