ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development and Validation of the Sharenting Behavior Scale Among Parents.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the proliferation of social media, sharenting has become a widespread parental behavior. Its prevalence, combined with its potential impact on children's privacy and well-being, highlights the need for a parent-specific psychometric instrument. The present study aimed to develop and validate the Sharenting Behavior Scale (SBS) to assess the factors influencing sharenting behavior. A total of 1483 parents participated. Psychometric testing included construct validity, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and reliability assessment. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a 30-item, six-dimensional structure explaining 49.60% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis validated this structure (robust CFI = 0.956, TLI = 0.950, RMSEA = 0.037, SRMR = 0.050). Convergent and discriminant validity were established, and concurrent validity was supported by positive associations with fear of missing out, social presence, and social media addiction. The total scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.86), with subscale alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients ranging from 0.72 to 0.90. The scale further demonstrated full measurement invariance across gender, supporting comparisons between male and female parents. These findings indicate that the SBS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing sharenting behavior among parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.