ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Effects of Humor in the Media: A Critical Review of Experimental Research.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humor has long been of interest to media effects scholars. As meta-analyses and systematic reviews accumulate, there is a need to continue scrutinizing the means of knowledge production. The purpose of this review was to investigate how humor was examined in experimental media effects research. In particular, we focused on how humor stimuli were constructed and how humor responses were measured. Based on a review of 47 published articles, we concluded that most studies examined herein did not manipulate humor message attributes, but rather employed a simple comparison between a piece of humorous content against a piece of non-humor content. Additionally, while most of the studies were guided by theory, only a minority of them included a humor theory; most of the studies used a measure of perceived humor for the manipulation check; the majority of studies used the humor response variable solely for the manipulation check; and only a few studies used the humor measure as a dependent variable. Recommendations are advanced to continue refining our understanding of the effects of humor in the media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.