Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651583›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Relational Reasoning Across Cultures: Consistency and Variation in South Korea, the United States, and China.

Alexandra Carstensen, Minju Kim, Youngon Choi, Caren M Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra CarstensenPsychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ 85306, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0582-9152
Minju KimDepartment of Psychology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5878-7350
Youngon ChoiDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0698-1511
Caren M WalkerDepartment of Psychology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-8611

Funding

Korean National Research Foundation NRF-2020R1F1A1068457National Science Foundation SBE-2047581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A bstract reasoning in early childhood is often described as following a "relational shift," over which children become increasingly sensitive to relations. However, recent work has challenged the generality of this account, showing that children in the US and China follow distinct trajectories in a relational match-to-sample task. This difference aligns with multiple cultural and linguistic factors implicated in relational reasoning, where the US and China appear at opposite ends of a continuum, focusing on objects (US) versus relations (CN). This raises the possibility that differences in culture and language may shape variation in the development of abstract reasoning. Here, we examine the early development of relational reasoning in South Korea, a cultural and linguistic context that lies between the US and China. If environmental factors shape relational reasoning, we may therefore observe a distinct developmental trajectory in Korean children. We find that Korean 18-30-month-olds successfully infer the

Indexed as

causal learningcognitive developmentcontextculturelanguagerelational reasoningSouth Korea

Identifiers

PMID42651583
PMCPMC13509761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.