Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651574›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Social Crowding and Shared Consumption with Close Friends Versus Strangers.

Lingling He, Wencai Zhou, Yuqi Qian, Shichang Liang, Jing Lin, Lingrui Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lingling HeSchool of Economics and Management, Nanning Normal University, No. 3, Hexing Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530299, China.
Wencai ZhouSchool of Economics and Management, Nanning Normal University, No. 3, Hexing Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530299, China.ORCID 0009-0001-2175-9943
Yuqi QianSchool of Economics and Management, Nanning Normal University, No. 3, Hexing Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530299, China.
Shichang LiangSchool of Business, Guangxi University, No. 100, Daxue Dong Road, Nanning 530004, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1174-6858
Jing LinSchool of Economics and Management, Nanning Normal University, No. 3, Hexing Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530299, China.
Lingrui TuNorwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 2025GXNSFAA069968National Natural Science Foundation of China 72162002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how social crowding (e.g., overcrowded environments) influences individuals' preferences for different modes of shared consumption (sharing-in vs. sharing-out). While existing research has predominantly explored shared consumption through the perspective of non-psychosocial environmental factors (e.g., time scarcity), this study shifts the focus to psychosocial environmental factors by analyzing the underlying mechanism through which social crowding shapes preferences for these modes of shared consumption. We conducted one field experiment and three scenario-based laboratory experiments to manipulate social crowding (vs. non-social crowding) across three distinct contexts: (1) restaurant-based social scenarios, (2) shopping mall consumption contexts, and (3) beach tourism settings. Across these experiments, diverse categories of shared goods were employed to examine participants' preferences for sharing-in versus sharing-out. The findings demonstrate that social crowding increases individuals' preference for sharing with close friends (i.e., sharing-in), whereas non-social crowding enhances their preference for sharing with strangers (i.e., sharing-out). This relationship is mediated by psychological distance. Furthermore, resource mindset (scarcity vs. abundance) moderates this effect. Specifically, under a scarcity mindset, social crowding strengthens preferences for sharing-in, whereas under an abundance mindset, it promotes preferences for sharing-out. By conceptualizing shared consumption from a psychosocial environmental perspective, this research extends current understanding of how environmental social cues shape interpersonal consumption decisions and provides practical implications for collaborative consumption platforms, hospitality services, retail environments, tourism destinations, and public service design. Specifically, platform managers and service designers can strategically optimize spatial layouts and perceived crowding levels to strengthen social connectedness among close friends or foster positive interactions between strangers.

Indexed as

construal level theorypsychological distanceresource mindsetshared consumptionsocial crowding

Identifiers

PMID42651574
PMCPMC13509942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.