ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
More than Depression: Doctoral Students' Mental Health in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mental health of doctoral students is a critical concern in higher education. Despite growing research attention, Chinese-language scholarship remains underrepresented in international academic discourse because of language barriers. This study systematically reviewed Chinese-language empirical research on doctoral students' mental health to summarize current findings and provide a comprehensive account of research trends. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched three major Chinese databases (CNKI, cqVIP, and Wanfang Data) from inception through December 2023. A content analysis examined research characteristics, methods, and findings across 35 eligible studies. A meta-analysis synthesized SCL-90 data from five studies comparing doctoral students with master's students, Chinese population norms, and Chinese youth norms using random-effects models. The content analysis revealed a three-stage evolution of the field: emergence (2005-2011), consolidation (2012-2017), and diversification (2018-2023), with increasing methodological sophistication and attention to vulnerable subgroups. The meta-analysis clarified inconsistent findings from individual studies, showing small differences between doctoral and master's students but more widespread symptom elevations relative to Chinese population and youth norms. Interpersonal sensitivity showed the most consistent elevation across all comparisons, particularly relative to youth norms, followed by depression and somatization. Implications for practice, research gaps, and directions for future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.