ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Attentional Orientation and Disengagement Mechanisms in Non-Target Processing of Self-Related Information and the Modulating Effect of Attentional Window.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whether the attentional capture mechanism of self-relevant information acting as non-target processing is entirely automatic or can be modulated by top-down goal setting remains inconclusive. Additionally, research has found that the attentional window modulates cognitive processing. Based on this, the present study employs a color-identity association paradigm and a modified spatial cueing paradigm to investigate the attentional capture mechanism (including attentional orienting and disengagement) of self-relevant information during non-target processing, as well as the moderating effect of the attentional window, through three experiments. Under the small attentional window condition, when self-relevant information was target-relevant (Experiment 1), participants showed faster attentional orienting and delayed disengagement toward self-relevant information compared to stranger information. When self-relevant information was target-irrelevant (Experiment 2), there were no significant differences in attentional orienting or disengagement between self-relevant and stranger information. Under the large attentional window condition, when self-relevant information was target-irrelevant (Experiment 3), participants exhibited faster attentional orienting and delayed disengagement toward self-relevant information compared to stranger information. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that attentional capture during non-target processing of self-relevant information is not entirely automatic but is modulated by top-down goal setting. The findings from Experiments 2 and 3 indicate that attentional window size regulates the mechanisms of attentional orienting and disengagement for self-relevant information during non-target processing. Collectively, these results reveal that although self-relevant information possesses marked salience, its processing remains subject to modulation by top-down goal setting. Furthermore, external factors such as attentional window size influence individual processing patterns of self-relevant information, demonstrating cognitive flexibility in self-relevant processing. This reflects individuals' capacity for adaptive adjustments to environmental changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.