ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Does AI Advertising Persuade or Scaffold? Consumer Cognitive Pathways in AI-Mediated Experiential Consumption.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AI-targeted advertising has become central to consumer-facing marketing, yet it does not directly persuade consumers to purchase experiential products. This study proposes a cognitive scaffolding framework, arguing that AI advertising supports consumers' autonomous value construction rather than directly generating purchase motivation. Using SEM with 412 Korean consumers in cultural experience tourism, the results show that AI advertising has no direct association with purchase intention. Instead, its association operates sequentially through perceived value and trust. Moreover, the value-purchase intention relationship is stronger among consumers with higher AI utilization. Complementary fsQCA shows that no single condition-including advertising effectiveness-is individually necessary for high purchase intention. A configurational analysis identifies a dominant sufficient path in which perceived value combines with AI utilization and does not require advertising effectiveness, alongside two secondary paths in which advertising effectiveness operates only in conjunction with other conditions. This pattern is consistent with a reconceptualization of AI advertising as one of several substitutable cognitive scaffolding inputs, interpretable as supporting rather than driving consumers' autonomous value construction-a claim advanced as specific to experiential consumption contexts rather than as a general account of AI-mediated trust formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.