Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651485›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Development and Initial Validation of the Exercise Behavioral Inconsistency Scale (ExBIS): Factor Structure, Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Known-Groups Validity.

Bekir Erhan Orhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bekir Erhan OrhanFaculty of Sports Sciences, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul 34295, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3149-6630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many adults hold exercise intentions they do not enact, yet no instrument captures the cognitive-affective experience of this gap. This study developed and validated the Exercise Behavioral Inconsistency Scale (ExBIS), which measures four facets as a profile rather than a summative trait-intention level (IL), intention-action gap (IAG), emotional dissonance (ED), and internal rationalization (IR). Adults in Türkiye (

Indexed as

cognitive dissonanceexerciseintention–behavior gapmeasurement invariancepsychometric validationrationalizationscale development

Identifiers

PMID42651485
PMCPMC13509899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.